Put a little pumpkin in your panna cotta with this easy low-sugar recipe featuring caramel and pecans for topping. The hardest part is giving it time to chill.

Gallery

Recipe Summary

prep:
10 mins
cook:
10 mins
additional:
4 hrs 20 mins
total:
4 hrs 40 mins
Servings:
6
Yield:
6 (1/2)-cup servings
Advertisement

Ingredients

6
Original recipe yields 6 servings
The ingredient list now reflects the servings specified
PANNA COTTA:
CARAMEL:

Directions

Instructions Checklist
  • In a small bowl, combine gelatin with 3 tablespoons cool water and let sit for 5 minutes.

    Advertisement
  • In a medium saucepan, combine cream, pumpkin, sugar, stevia, cinnamon, and nutmeg. Bring just to a simmer, take off heat, and whisk in vanilla and gelatin.

  • Divide panna cotta mixture between 6 small cups or glasses using 1/2 cup mixture per serving. Cover and refrigerate for at least 4 hours and up to 24 hours.

  • For the caramel, combine sugar and 1/3 cup water in a large saucepan and stir constantly over medium-low heat until sugar is completely dissolved. Increase heat to medium and cook until syrup is a very dark amber color.

  • Take pan off heat and stir in butter, cream, and salt until smooth. Let cool to room temperature.

  • Serve panna cotta topped with caramel and sprinkled with pecans. Cover and refrigerate any leftover caramel.

Nutrition Facts

616 calories; protein 4g; carbohydrates 55.9g; fat 43.9g; cholesterol 129mg; sodium 332.2mg. Full Nutrition
Advertisement

Reviews (3)

Read More Reviews

Most helpful positive review

Rating: 5 stars
10/07/2019
https://totomarket.org Thank you for providing such delicious cooking information Read More

Most helpful critical review

Rating: 1 stars
10/07/2019
Ummmm, no. Read More
3 Ratings
  • 5 star values: 1
  • 4 star values: 0
  • 3 star values: 0
  • 2 star values: 0
  • 1 star values: 2
Rating: 5 stars
10/07/2019
https://totomarket.org Thank you for providing such delicious cooking information Read More
Rating: 1 stars
10/07/2019
How is 55.9gm of carbohydrate considered “low/reduced.” This is misleading. Read More
Rating: 1 stars
10/07/2019
Ummmm, no. Read More
Advertisement